The Urban Design team went to PUD on Monday March 5th to discuss their approach to outline plans and other related issues. Decisions were not made but Administration was to confirm council’s interpretation to ensure they were moving in the right direction.  Many of you engaged with the Federation and the city on an initial design gaps exploration exercise. Your participation helped to steer the direction of Attachment 1 as it pertains to Outline Plans. The following are the report and a short summary of their content

Urban Design Initiatives Update – PUD2018-0170

Attach 2 – Scope of Work – Redundancies

Attach 1 – Scope of Work – Outline Plan Design Gaps

Attach 3 – Scope of Work – Urban Design Review Framework Monitoring

Attach 4 – Getting to Quality Development

  1. Urban Design Initiatives Update- summarizes the entire scope of the project. The purpose of going to PUD was to confirm council’s interpretations on the following initiatives: Scope 1, 2,3.
  2. Attachment 1- Outline Plan Design Gaps
  1. Attachment 2: Redundancies (internal analysis of city process)
    • Purpose: Review unnecessary redundancies in the design review process i.e. overlaps between Calgary Planning Commission, Urban Design Review Panel and Administration
    • Scope of work: There is no one specific monitoring tool that tracks redundancies, however, redundancies should become apparent through use of the various monitoring tools and the detailed watch of how the new program is performing throughout 2018.
    • Timeline: The monitoring program began September 2017 and will continue through 2018. Analysis of the data collected and a description of changes undertaken and recommended will be included in a Report to Council Q1 2019.
  2. Attachment 4: Urban Design Review Framework Monitoring (working with Industry)
    • Purpose: to monitor the progress of the Urban Design Framework  and identify any remaining non-productive redundancies in the design review process
    • Scope of work:
      • identifying opportunities to improve effectiveness and efficiency;
      • streamlining processes where possible;
      • eliminating activities of limited value;
      • identifying whether any process redundancies exist, and
      • Identifying areas of unclarity or disagreement over expectations of quality design
    • Timeline: The monitoring program began September 2017 and will continue through 2018. Analysis of the data collected and a description of changes undertaken and recommended will be included in a Report to Council Q1 2019.